Project Risk Identification – Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education https://www.jriiejournal.com Fri, 11 Apr 2025 04:09:13 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4 https://www.jriiejournal.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/cropped-JRIIE-LOGO-1-32x32.jpg Project Risk Identification – Journal of Research Innovation and Implications in Education https://www.jriiejournal.com 32 32 194867206 Effect of Risk Management Practices on Project Performance: A Case of Rwanda Urban Development Project https://www.jriiejournal.com/effect-of-risk-management-practices-on-project-performance-a-case-of-rwanda-urban-development-project/?utm_source=rss&utm_medium=rss&utm_campaign=effect-of-risk-management-practices-on-project-performance-a-case-of-rwanda-urban-development-project Fri, 11 Apr 2025 04:05:20 +0000 https://www.jriiejournal.com/?p=6265 Read More Read More

]]>
Mukalay Djese Nanette & Samuel Wabala
University of Kigali, Rwanda
https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4424-1279
Email: najesse@gmail.com

Abstract: This study aimed to assess the effect of project risk management on performance of Rwanda Urban Development Project (RUDP) in Rwanda. A descriptive and correlational research design was applied, and data analysis was conducted using SPSS to examine the relationship between project risk management practices and project performance. The R-value of 0.862 signifies a strong relationship between the independent variables and project performance, as values above 0.7 indicate a strong effect. The R-Square value of 0.742 indicates that 74.2% of the variations in project performance are explained through project risk identification, risk analysis, response planning, monitoring and control. A unit increase in project risk identification results in a 0.249 increase in project performance (β = 0.249, t = 4.195, p = 0.000), confirming its significance. A unit increase in project risk analysis leads to a 0.217 increase in project performance (β = 0.217, t = 2.771, p = 0.006), reinforcing its role in reducing project uncertainties. Project risk response planning contributes positively, with a unit increase leading to a 0.272 rise in project performance (β = 0.272, t = 3.151, p = 0.002), demonstrating its importance. Likewise, project risk monitoring and control positively impacts project performance. With a unit increase resulting in a 0.204 increase (β = 0.204, t = 3.029, p = 0.003). The study recommended that project managers establish a detailed scope definition framework and ensure strict adherence to guidelines throughout execution to prevent scope creep and maintain project focus.

]]>
6265